Back Portfolio Strategy

Equity Linked Strategies: Fading Momentum is Hard & A Pain Trade

Published on April 19, 2023

∙ Download the PDF Report

By

Dennis DeBusschere

Brian Herlihy

Kevin Brocks

Sophia Wang

FADING MOMENTUM IS HARD: We are near the top of our S&P 500 fair value range (3800 – 4200) and Momentum has been the best performing factor since early Feb. In a mean reverting backdrop, that implies it’s a good time to think about fading momentum. Since Jan 2022, our Price Momentum factor has fallen aggressively whenever it has fallen, but there isn’t any consistent timing. The price failure factor, which is a l-s basket playing reversals of short term (1wk – 1mo) price momentum, has performed poorly for much of the past year. Momentum factors were among the most volatile factors last year. There is risk and a lot of volatility to playing a Momentum reversal without a catalyst.

Chart, line chart

Description automatically generated

Through options trades, high volatility means S&P puts are expensive. Recently, 1-month, 25 delta SPX puts have come down in price, but are still elevated relative to 2021 (and certainly elevated relative to pre-pandemic). With vol expensive and catalysts mixed (we think earnings will be better than expected, but the Fed more aggressive than expected), we prefer positioning for reversals in industry groups/single stocks we have conviction in.

That matches up with one of our highest conviction themes – positioning for less intra-portfolio correlation. As near-term recession risk eases, there should be more internal dispersion than movements at the index level. Earnings season ought to present opportunities as well. Stock picking remains a better path to outperformance than market timing. That is one of the motivations behind yesterday’s NVDA trade. John Roque continues to believe NVDA is going to weaken, so with his help, we structured a NVDA trade (details HERE).

One way to play dispersion through indices is pairing RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) vs SPY. We recommended that trade a couple weeks ago (HERE). To recap, we like buying RSP risk reversals and SPY collars, expiring in June. Since then, skew shows investors have not embraced equal weight vs cap weight more. Skew in the SPY is stable, while skew in the RSP has shifted a little more bearish. We still like the trade here.

PAIN TRADE: BofA’s latest fund managers survey found investors are the longest bonds relative to stocks since 2009. As we highlighted in today’s DN (HERE), we think yields are biased higher from a combo of 1) sticky inflation/decent growth 2) a persistent Fed, and 3) a likely higher neutral rate (HERE). Long bonds (short yields) relies on elevated near-term deep recession risk, which we do not think is a given. Our macro quant model classifies the current regime as ‘Transition,’ but the probability of ‘Normal’ has risen in recent months, despite investors’ perceived odds of a recession rising. There is a growing disconnect between recession expectations and the distribution of economic data.

Chart

Description automatically generated

The pain trade is higher yields and higher equities. To hedge against that risk, which is cheap given positioning, we like buying SPY 6/16 $432 calls and selling TLT 6/16 $111 calls (TLT price moves opposite yields). The trade could also be structured by selling SPY and TLT puts, but given the SPY is at the top of our fair value range, we prefer buying SPY calls. We have more conviction on rates. Some scenarios mocked up below.

Graphical user interface, table

Description automatically generated

ELS RECAP: The performance of all our equity linked strategies is below. We would close the short Transports trade. Although we still prefer Early Cyclicals, Transports have mean reverted and the trade has worked. We would also close the Real Estate vs Health Care trade from earlier this year. We are staying away from REITs while there is growing concern over commercial real estate.

Many of our open trades have been disrupted by the bank failures. Retail vs Staples was particularly poor (and would’ve been stopped out). But since bank systemic risk is fading, that means there are market dislocations that could close, like Retail vs Staples.

DISCLOSURES AND DISCLAIMERS

Analyst Certification

The analyst, 22V Research Group, primarily responsible for the preparation of this research report attests to the following: (1) that the views and opinions rendered in this research report reflect his or her personal views about the subject companies or issuers; and (2) that no part of the research analyst’s compensation was, is, or will be directly related to the specific recommendations or views in this research report.

Analyst Certifications and Independence of Research.

Each of the 22V Research analysts whose names appear on the front page of this report hereby certify that all the views expressed in this Report accurately reflect our personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers and that no part of our compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views of in this Report.

22V Research (the “Company”) is an independent research provider. The Company is not a member of the FINRA or the SIPC and is not a registered broker dealer or investment adviser. 22V Research has no other regulated or unregulated business activities which conflict with its provision of independent research.

22V Research, LLC is a professional services and independent publication organization. 22V Research, LLC is not a securities broker-dealer, not a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), not a registered investment advisor (RIA) and not a member of SIPC.

Securities transactions, when offered, are offered by 22V Securities, LLC through LPS Capital, LLC. Certain employees of 22V Securities, LLC are dually registered as securities representatives of LPS Capital, LLC or Analyst Hub Securities, LLC. 22V Securities, LPS Capital and Analyst Hub Securities are members FINRA, SIPC.

https://brokercheck.finra.org/

Current Ratings Definition.

SECTOR OUTPERFORM: An “outperform” rating anticipates the company will outperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR PERFORM: A “market perform” rating anticipates the company will perform in line with the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR UNDERPERFORM: An “underperform” rating anticipates the company will underperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

Limitation Of Research And Information.

This Report has been prepared for distribution to only qualified institutional or professional clients of 22V Research Group. The contents of this Report represent the views, opinions, and analyses of its authors. The information contained herein does not constitute financial, legal, tax or any other advice. All third-party data presented herein were obtained from publicly available sources which are believed to be reliable; however, the Company makes no warranty, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of such information. In no event shall the Company be responsible or liable for the correctness of, or update to, any such material or for any damage or lost opportunities resulting from use of this data. Nothing contained in this Report or any distribution by the Company should be construed as any offer to sell, or any solicitation of an offer to buy, any security or investment. Any research or other material received should not be construed as individualized investment advice. Investment decisions should be made as part of an overall portfolio strategy and you should consult with a professional financial advisor, legal and tax advisor prior to making any investment decision. 22V Research Group shall not be liable for any direct or indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage (including loss of profits, revenue or goodwill) arising from any investment decisions based on information or research obtained from 22V Research Group.

Reproduction And Distribution Strictly Prohibited.

No user of this Report may reproduce, modify, copy, distribute, sell, resell, transmit, transfer, license, assign or publish the Report itself or any information contained therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, clients with access to working models are permitted to alter or modify the information contained therein, provided that it is solely for such client’s own use. This Report is not intended to be available or distributed for any purpose that would be deemed unlawful or otherwise prohibited by any local, state, national or international laws or regulations or would otherwise subject the Company to registration or regulation of any kind within such jurisdiction.

Copyrights, Trademarks, Intellectual Property.

22V Research Group, and any logos or marks included in this Report are proprietary materials. The use of such terms and logos and marks without the express written consent of 22V Research Group is strictly prohibited. The copyright in the pages or in the screens of the Report, and in the information and material therein, is proprietary material owned by 22V Research Group unless otherwise indicated. The unauthorized use of any material on this Report may violate numerous statutes, regulations and laws, including, but not limited to, copyright, trademark, trade secret or patent laws.