Back Quantitative

Quant Market in Numbers: Strong Sales but Less Exciting EPS Trends Delivers Mixed Price Momentum Outlook

Published on July 26, 2026

∙ Download the PDF Report

By

Dennis DeBusschere

Sophia Wang

Kevin Brocks

With 20% of S&P 500 companies reported, S&P 1500 earnings growth remains solid. 77.6% of companies have beat EPS estimates, though beats are concentrated in the <=10% range. The 2Q earnings releases are important as a potential catalyst to stabilize Price Momentum performance, however, reported readings for now offer a mixed picture for the factor.

On sale beats, Price Mo names lead all other factors and are posting one of the largest beat rates relative to its own history. The implication is that the elevated revenue expectations of high Price Mo names have largely been met. However, the factor’s 76% EPS beat rate ranks behind half of factors and is less compelling given Price Mos historically high beat rate relative to other factors. EPS Momentum is more interesting, currently ranking second on EPS beats, reinforcing our preference for EPS Momentum over Price Mo. Our L-S swap of EPS Mo vs Price Mo has gained 10.4% over the past month.

Management commentary points to the same divergence. Price Mo remains among the factor leaders in absolute earnings sentiment and has median margin sentiment. However, its earnings sentiment, margin outlooks, and guidance breadth have all trended lower over the past quarter. Strong sales alongside softer EPS and margin commentary suggests cost pressures and capital expenditures are limiting operating leverage of high Price Mo names.

As we expect the strong sales and lackluster earnings combination to continue, upcoming reports from AI beneficiaries could help stabilize Price Mo, but are less likely to resolve longer-term profitability concerns.

175 S&P 500 companies report this week, and we highlight the names with the greatest beat potential and miss risk at the end of report.

Strong Sales but Less Exciting EPS Trends Delivers Mixed Price Momentum Outlook: Earnings surprise for the S&P 1500 remains strong in 2Q. With 20% of companies reported, 77.6% beating estimates. The distribution is less polarized in 2Q than normal and relative to last quarter. Fewer names are posting extreme beats or misses (exceeding +/-20%) while the percentage posting 0-20% beats has increased. The net is that that breadth of earnings beats has improved even as index EPS growth has accelerated to ~27% y/y.

Price Mo earnings releases are an important catalyst for stabilization of the factor following its recent drawdown. So far, reported high Momentum names have painted a mixed picture. Price Mo is the best performing factor in terms of 2Q sales beat raes. It is also one of the factors with the highest sales beat rate relative to its own history. On the top line, the high expectations embedded in Price Mo names have been justified by results.

But the EPS beat rate of high Price Mo names is less impressive. Currently, Price Mo’s 2Q EPS beat rate is ~76%, roughly 7pp above its median. However, Price Mo’s EPS beat rate is in the middle of the pack relative to all factors, which is unusual. Typically, high Price Mo names have the best beat rates Critically, EPS Momentum currently has the second-highest EPS beat rate. As we highlighted (HERE), we favor EPS Mo over Price Mo, and our swap of long S&P 1500 EPS Momentum and short S&P 1500 Price M has gained 10.4% MoM.

Sentiment readings expressed by management for Price Mo names remain among the highest of all factors, but its earnings sentiment has dropped over the past quarter, falling more than any factor other than Earnings Turbulence and Quality. The bottom line is high Price Mo names continue to enjoy strong level of sentiment, but the direction of travel has been lower.

The top decile S&P 1500 Price Mo margin outlook sentiment also dropped, falling the most of all our factors. Price Mo’s absolute margin sentiment remains around that of other factors, but the direction is lower. Margin sentiment declines and lackluster earnings beats combined with strong sales beats suggests increasing costs, capex etc. (see Appendix for details) are weighing on the bottom line performance of high Price Mo names.

Earnings guidance adds to the cost driven concerns with net guidance by high Price Mo names turning negative. With more Price Mo AI beneficiaries reporting in the coming weeks, a similar pattern of strong sales alongside more cautious EPS and margin commentary is likely to persist. Strong absolute results should help stabilize Price Mo, but are not likely to alleviate longer-term profitability concerns.

Week Ahead: 175 S&P 500 names are scheduled to report this week. Below we list the names falling in the higher beat potential basket. These names have high Earnings Quality and positive earnings sentiment scores. Those more likely to miss estimates have high Earnings Turbulence and negative earnings sentiment score.

Appendix:

INTC, GEV and JBHT are three names in Momentum of Price Basket that reported over the past two weeks, and they represent three different industries Semiconductors, Electrical Equipment, and Transportation that directly benefited from the Broad AI Buildout. Strong sales but less exciting EPS are expressed repetitively among the top Price Momentum names and we highlight them below.

Intel CEO Lip-Tu Tan highlighted: “Today, we are seeing the strongest revenue growth in more than 15 years.” While CFO David Zinser mentions “Operating profit for CCPG was $2.3 billion, 26% of revenue, and down approximately $173 million quarter over quarter, due to inventory charges taken to optimize our factory network”.

GE Vernova Inc CFO highlighted: “In the second quarter, we booked orders of $24.2 billion, an 88% increase year-over-year. Revenue increased 68% on a reported basis. Equipment backlog to $41 billion, up 69%.” But also included that “EBITDA margins expanded 320 basis points to 18.8%, mainly driven by favorable price and higher volume more than offsetting inflation as well as additional expenses to support capacity investments at Gas along with R&D.”

J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. CFO Brad Delco stated, “Our revenue increased 35% with load growth of 14%, but our gross profit dollars declined 12%, primarily due to higher purchase transportation rates.”

DISCLOSURES AND DISCLAIMERS

Analyst Certification

The analyst, 22V Research Group, primarily responsible for the preparation of this research report attests to the following: (1) that the views and opinions rendered in this research report reflect his or her personal views about the subject companies or issuers; and (2) that no part of the research analyst’s compensation was, is, or will be directly related to the specific recommendations or views in this research report.

Analyst Certifications and Independence of Research.

Each of the 22V Research analysts whose names appear on the front page of this report hereby certify that all the views expressed in this Report accurately reflect our personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers and that no part of our compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views of in this Report.

22V Research (the “Company”) is an independent research provider. The Company is not a member of the FINRA or the SIPC and is not a registered broker dealer or investment adviser. 22V Research has no other regulated or unregulated business activities which conflict with its provision of independent research.

22V Research, LLC is a professional services and independent publication organization. 22V Research, LLC is not a securities broker-dealer, not a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), not a registered investment advisor (RIA) and not a member of SIPC.

Securities transactions, when offered, are offered by 22V Securities, LLC through LPS Capital, LLC. Certain employees of 22V Securities, LLC are dually registered as securities representatives of LPS Capital, LLC or Analyst Hub Securities, LLC. 22V Securities, LPS Capital and Analyst Hub Securities are members FINRA, SIPC.

https://brokercheck.finra.org/

Current Ratings Definition.

SECTOR OUTPERFORM: An “outperform” rating anticipates the company will outperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR PERFORM: A “market perform” rating anticipates the company will perform in line with the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR UNDERPERFORM: An “underperform” rating anticipates the company will underperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

Limitation Of Research And Information.

This Report has been prepared for distribution to only qualified institutional or professional clients of 22V Research Group. The contents of this Report represent the views, opinions, and analyses of its authors. The information contained herein does not constitute financial, legal, tax or any other advice. All third-party data presented herein were obtained from publicly available sources which are believed to be reliable; however, the Company makes no warranty, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of such information. In no event shall the Company be responsible or liable for the correctness of, or update to, any such material or for any damage or lost opportunities resulting from use of this data. Nothing contained in this Report or any distribution by the Company should be construed as any offer to sell, or any solicitation of an offer to buy, any security or investment. Any research or other material received should not be construed as individualized investment advice. Investment decisions should be made as part of an overall portfolio strategy and you should consult with a professional financial advisor, legal and tax advisor prior to making any investment decision. 22V Research Group shall not be liable for any direct or indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage (including loss of profits, revenue or goodwill) arising from any investment decisions based on information or research obtained from 22V Research Group.

Reproduction And Distribution Strictly Prohibited.

No user of this Report may reproduce, modify, copy, distribute, sell, resell, transmit, transfer, license, assign or publish the Report itself or any information contained therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, clients with access to working models are permitted to alter or modify the information contained therein, provided that it is solely for such client’s own use. This Report is not intended to be available or distributed for any purpose that would be deemed unlawful or otherwise prohibited by any local, state, national or international laws or regulations or would otherwise subject the Company to registration or regulation of any kind within such jurisdiction.

Copyrights, Trademarks, Intellectual Property.

22V Research Group, and any logos or marks included in this Report are proprietary materials. The use of such terms and logos and marks without the express written consent of 22V Research Group is strictly prohibited. The copyright in the pages or in the screens of the Report, and in the information and material therein, is proprietary material owned by 22V Research Group unless otherwise indicated. The unauthorized use of any material on this Report may violate numerous statutes, regulations and laws, including, but not limited to, copyright, trademark, trade secret or patent laws.