Back Quantitative

Quant Market in Numbers: Working Through Fair Value Frameworks

Published on December 7, 2022

Download the PDF Report

By

Dennis DeBusschere

Brian Herlihy

Sophia Wang

Kevin Brocks

Uncertainty about the policy path amid still too high inflation is driving another bout of macro-driven market moves. The backup in bond yields has left the traditional equity risk premium measure (the spread between the S&P NTM earnings yield and US 10yr yield) at its lowest level of the post-GFC era, despite relatively stable earnings and a 4.5 points of PE contraction. The result has been concerns of a sharp downturn and a retest of the market low. BUT looking at the equity risk premium based on a discounted cash return equity risk premium shows investors have discounted far more uncertainty.

The sharp divergence can be explained by exceptionally high inflation. The spread between the S&P earnings yield and REAL 10yr yield has climbed to the upper end of its post-GFC range, consistent with the backup in the cash return discounted equity risk premium. Inflation is biased lower over the next year, and even without any change in the market, that will narrow the real versus nominal equity risk premium.

Chart

Description automatically generated

Applying a 5.5% equity risk premium, roughly the median level in the post-GFC period, puts S&P fair value at 4210, or 6.8% higher than yesterday’s close. There is downside risk to earnings estimates, and Macro uncertainty is still elevated so narrative shifts will continue to push markets around near-term. Even with those considerations, the fair value range on the market argues against a breakdown to new lows.

At the sector level, the current equity risk premiums are lower across all sectors relative to September, especially for deep Cyclicals. The composition of cash return is important when thinking about sector-level fair value. Communications yield is skewed toward buybacks, which are likely to slow much more significantly than dividends in the event of a recession. That reinforces the importance of focusing on companies with high pricing power (HERE) and names with high earnings and cash return sentiment (HERE).

At the end of the report, we run through the S&P fair value calculation under a 5.5% equity risk premium scenario with the consensus EPS estimation. We can run this analysis for any set of earnings estimates/cash return/10yr yield assumptions. Let us know if you would like a scenario run.

Working Through Fair Value Frameworks: Uncertainty about the policy path amid still too high inflation is driving another bout of macro-driven market moves. The backup in bond yields has left the traditional equity risk premium measure (the spread between the S&P NTM earnings yield and US 10yr yield) at its lowest level of the post-GFC era, despite relatively stable earnings and a 4.5 points of PE contraction. The result has been concerns of a sharp downturn and a retest of the market low. BUT looking at the equity risk premium based on a discounted cash return equity risk premium shows investors have discounted far more uncertainty.

Graphical user interface, chart

Description automatically generated

The sharp divergence can be explained by exceptionally high inflation. The spread between the S&P earnings yield and REAL 10yr yield has climbed to the upper end of its post-GFC range, consistent with the backup in the cash return discounted equity risk premium. We prefer the equity risk premium measured by discounted forward cash return as it accounts for dividends and net buybacks. Total cash return has become a large part of expected market returns.  

Chart

Description automatically generated

As inflation has trended lower recently, macro risk moved lower, and implied volatility for equity, bonds, and currencies all dropped. Historically, the implied ERP has been positively correlated with the VIX. Macro uncertainty is still elevated and until 4Q earning season starts next month, relatively sparse macro data and narrative shifts will continue to push markets around. But assuming a deep recession is avoided, lower volatility should bias the equity risk premium lower over time.

Using consensus EPS estimates, an equity risk premium higher than 6% would lead to and S&P fair below the current level of the market. Applying a 5.5% equity risk premium, roughly the median level in the post-GFC period, puts S&P fair value at 4210, or 6.8% higher than yesterday’s close.

Chart, waterfall chart

Description automatically generated

At the sector level, current equity risk premiums are lower than normal across all sectors, especially deep Cyclicals. Energy remains the sector with the highest equity risk premium (and the greatest macro influence) while REIT’s equity risk premium is lower than all other sectors.

Chart

Description automatically generated

Cash return yield (dividend yield and net buyback yield), which is a major input into the implied ERP calculation, shows Communications, Energy, and Materials are the greatest total yields, while REITs, Utilities, and Discretionary have the lowest. The composition of cash return is important when thinking about sector level fair value. Communications yield is skewed toward buybacks, which are likely to slow much more significantly than dividends in the event of a recession. That reinforces the importance of focusing on companies with high pricing power (HERE) and names with high earnings and cash return sentiment (HERE). Defensives are generally more dividend skewed, confirming that they would be relatively attractive in the event of a deep recession.

Chart, bar chart, box and whisker chart

Description automatically generated

Below we walk through the current S&P fair value calculation under a 5.5% equity risk premium with consensus EPS estimates. The discounted forward cash return leads to the estimated S&P fair value at 4210. We can run this analysis for any set of earnings estimates/cash return/10yr yield assumptions. Let us know if you would like a scenario run.

Table

Description automatically generated

DISCLOSURES AND DISCLAIMERS

Analyst Certification

The analyst, 22V Research Group, primarily responsible for the preparation of this research report attests to the following: (1) that the views and opinions rendered in this research report reflect his or her personal views about the subject companies or issuers; and (2) that no part of the research analyst’s compensation was, is, or will be directly related to the specific recommendations or views in this research report.

Analyst Certifications and Independence of Research.

Each of the 22V Research analysts whose names appear on the front page of this report hereby certify that all the views expressed in this Report accurately reflect our personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers and that no part of our compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views of in this Report.

22V Research (the “Company”) is an independent research provider. The Company is not a member of the FINRA or the SIPC and is not a registered broker dealer or investment adviser. 22V Research has no other regulated or unregulated business activities which conflict with its provision of independent research.

22V Research, LLC is a professional services and independent publication organization. 22V Research, LLC is not a securities broker-dealer, not a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), not a registered investment advisor (RIA) and not a member of SIPC.

Securities transactions, when offered, are offered by 22V Securities, LLC through LPS Capital, LLC. Certain employees of 22V Securities, LLC are dually registered as securities representatives of LPS Capital, LLC or Analyst Hub Securities, LLC. 22V Securities, LPS Capital and Analyst Hub Securities are members FINRA, SIPC.

https://brokercheck.finra.org/

Current Ratings Definition.

SECTOR OUTPERFORM: An “outperform” rating anticipates the company will outperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR PERFORM: A “market perform” rating anticipates the company will perform in line with the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR UNDERPERFORM: An “underperform” rating anticipates the company will underperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

Limitation Of Research And Information.

This Report has been prepared for distribution to only qualified institutional or professional clients of 22V Research Group. The contents of this Report represent the views, opinions, and analyses of its authors. The information contained herein does not constitute financial, legal, tax or any other advice. All third-party data presented herein were obtained from publicly available sources which are believed to be reliable; however, the Company makes no warranty, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of such information. In no event shall the Company be responsible or liable for the correctness of, or update to, any such material or for any damage or lost opportunities resulting from use of this data. Nothing contained in this Report or any distribution by the Company should be construed as any offer to sell, or any solicitation of an offer to buy, any security or investment. Any research or other material received should not be construed as individualized investment advice. Investment decisions should be made as part of an overall portfolio strategy and you should consult with a professional financial advisor, legal and tax advisor prior to making any investment decision. 22V Research Group shall not be liable for any direct or indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage (including loss of profits, revenue or goodwill) arising from any investment decisions based on information or research obtained from 22V Research Group.

Reproduction And Distribution Strictly Prohibited.

No user of this Report may reproduce, modify, copy, distribute, sell, resell, transmit, transfer, license, assign or publish the Report itself or any information contained therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, clients with access to working models are permitted to alter or modify the information contained therein, provided that it is solely for such client’s own use. This Report is not intended to be available or distributed for any purpose that would be deemed unlawful or otherwise prohibited by any local, state, national or international laws or regulations or would otherwise subject the Company to registration or regulation of any kind within such jurisdiction.

Copyrights, Trademarks, Intellectual Property.

22V Research Group, and any logos or marks included in this Report are proprietary materials. The use of such terms and logos and marks without the express written consent of 22V Research Group is strictly prohibited. The copyright in the pages or in the screens of the Report, and in the information and material therein, is proprietary material owned by 22V Research Group unless otherwise indicated. The unauthorized use of any material on this Report may violate numerous statutes, regulations and laws, including, but not limited to, copyright, trademark, trade secret or patent laws.