Back AI Macro Nexus Research

The Edge Awakens: Why Power Semiconductors Are the Next Scarcity Trade

Published on April 27, 2026

Download the PDF Report

By

Jordi Visser

Artificial intelligence had been dominated by one story: compute. GPUs, memory, and massive model training captured nearly all the attention inperformance through the end of 2025. But as I outlined in my recent thematic work, “The Whole Rack”, which expanded the AI opportunity from GPUs to the full infrastructure stack , and “Edge AI Investment Universe”, which mapped the system-level bottlenecks across compute, power, and deployment, the real shift underway is broader driven by the needs of the agentic world and the AI physical upgrade. This week’s signals from Intel, Texas Instruments, and NVIDIA’s reported 800V DC power push in South Korea reinforce that view. The next phase of AI will be defined by where intelligence happens and how efficiently it is powered. Edge devices and power efficiency are now converging into one investment theme, and power semiconductors sit directly in the middle.

Intel made the edge thesis explicit in earnings this week. As AI moves from foundational model training to inference and agentic workloads, more computation needs to happen closer to the end user. Intel said the “next wave of AI will bring intelligence closer to the end user,” increasing demand for CPUs, wafers, and advanced packaging. It also emphasized that the CPU is becoming central to edge AI computing as orchestration tasks and agentic workloads scale. That matters because AI inference is continuous, distributed, and latency-sensitive. It needs CPUs, connectivity, packaging, and efficient power management across far more locations than the original GPU training cycle.

Texas Instruments adds the physical-world evidence from its earnings. TI’s industrial demand is broadening, with management pointing to several quarters of improvement and strength tied to industrial customers and data centers. That industrial strength increasingly reflects smarter machines, buildings, factories, vehicles, and grid infrastructure. TI has also described edge AI as already present in devices, enabled by microcontrollers with AI accelerators and neural processing units. These systems bring intelligence into equipment that must run efficiently, reliably, and often with tight power constraints.

Put Intel and TI together and the message becomes clear: edge AI is starting to move from concept to deployment. Intel is seeing the compute side through CPUs and agentic workloads. TI is seeing the device side through industrial electronics, embedded systems, analog chips, and power management. The common thread is that intelligence is spreading outward from the cloud into the physical world.

That leads directly to the power problem. Recent South Korean media reports say NVIDIA has approached Korean power equipment companies about designing infrastructure around 800V DC architectures for next-generation AI data centers. The goal is to reduce conversion losses, cut copper intensity, simplify power distribution, and support far higher rack power densities. This is an important signal. NVIDIA is treating power delivery as a core scaling challenge for AI infrastructure.

The move from traditional lower-voltage systems toward 800V DC changes the power stack. Higher-voltage architectures require more sophisticated power devices, better conversion, advanced protection, and tighter system design. This increases the importance of silicon carbide, gallium nitride, high-performance analog, power modules, solid-state transformers, and power management ICs. In other words, the AI infrastructure trade is broadening from GPUs and memory into the components that move, convert, regulate, and protect electricity.

This is why power semiconductors are becoming a central AI beneficiary. Every step of the AI buildout requires more efficient power conversion. Data centers need it to handle megawatt-scale racks. Edge devices need it to run intelligence locally without wasting energy. Industrial systems need it for motors, sensors, robotics, automation, and grid equipment. Vehicles need it as cars become rolling compute platforms. The more AI spreads, the more power management becomes mission-critical.

The most important part of this thesis is that the edge and the data center are connected. The cloud trains and coordinates large models, while the edge executes more intelligence closer to users, machines, and devices. Both sides increase demand for power semiconductors. Centralized AI needs higher-voltage, higher-density power systems. Distributed AI needs efficient local power management across billions of endpoints. The same macro trend supports both.

This also changes the way investors should think about cyclicality. Power semiconductors have historically been treated as industrial and auto cycle stocks, tied to the familiar four-year rhythm of inventory corrections, factory slowdowns, and auto production cycles. That perception still exists after the 2024–2025 industrial slowdown. At the same time, the structural tailwind from AI is beginning to reshape demand. The end markets are expanding beyond autos and factories into AI data centers, edge devices, robotics, and grid infrastructure. The cycle remains, but the underlying demand base is part of a cycle the world has never experienced and becoming broader and more durable.

The geopolitical overlay makes the argument even stronger. Sovereign AI is becoming a national priority, with countries building local compute capacity, localized data centers, and more resilient technology supply chains. Those systems require localized electricity infrastructure, grid upgrades, and advanced power conversion. Power semiconductors are therefore part of the “China + 1” strategy and increasingly tied to national infrastructure planning. As countries invest in energy systems to support AI, the power stack becomes a strategic layer of the technology ecosystem.

This creates a powerful demand loop. More AI adoption creates more inference. More inference creates more edge compute. More edge compute creates more power demand. More power demand creates greater need for efficiency. Greater efficiency requires more advanced power semiconductors. This loop is still early because most of the world’s machines, vehicles, buildings, factories, and devices have not yet been rebuilt around AI. This is the base of Jensen Huang’s Five Layer Cake analogy

That is the key investment point. The first AI wave rewarded the companies closest to model training. The next wave should broaden toward the companies that enable AI to scale in the real world. That includes CPUs, MCUs, analog, power management, advanced packaging, optics, cooling, electrical equipment, and grid infrastructure. Power semiconductors are especially important because they sit at the intersection of compute growth, energy demand, edge deployment, and national infrastructure investment.

Intel’s earnings commentary shows that the compute architecture is shifting. Texas Instruments shows that industrial edge demand is broadening. NVIDIA’s reported 800V DC push shows that power architecture itself is being redesigned. These are three different signals pointing in the same direction: AI is becoming more distributed, more physical, and more power-intensive.

The market is still early in recognizing this. Investors understand GPUs and memory. They are beginning to understand optics and cooling. The next layer is power. As AI moves from centralized training to persistent inference and then into agentic systems, power efficiency becomes one of the most valuable bottlenecks in the entire stack.

The conclusion is simple: the next phase of AI is about powering intelligence everywhere. Power semiconductors are evolving into core infrastructure for the AI age. And if edge AI is only beginning, then the power semiconductor cycle is likely only beginning too.

DISCLOSURES AND DISCLAIMERS

Analyst Certification

The analyst, 22V Research Group, primarily responsible for the preparation of this research report attests to the following: (1) that the views and opinions rendered in this research report reflect his or her personal views about the subject companies or issuers; and (2) that no part of the research analyst’s compensation was, is, or will be directly related to the specific recommendations or views in this research report.

Analyst Certifications and Independence of Research.

Each of the 22V Research analysts whose names appear on the front page of this report hereby certify that all the views expressed in this Report accurately reflect our personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers and that no part of our compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views of in this Report.

22V Research (the “Company”) is an independent research provider. The Company is not a member of the FINRA or the SIPC and is not a registered broker dealer or investment adviser. 22V Research has no other regulated or unregulated business activities which conflict with its provision of independent research.

22V Research, LLC is a professional services and independent publication organization. 22V Research, LLC is not a securities broker-dealer, not a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), not a registered investment advisor (RIA) and not a member of SIPC.

Securities transactions, when offered, are offered by 22V Securities, LLC through LPS Capital, LLC. Certain employees of 22V Securities, LLC are dually registered as securities representatives of LPS Capital, LLC or Analyst Hub Securities, LLC. 22V Securities, LPS Capital and Analyst Hub Securities are members FINRA, SIPC.

https://brokercheck.finra.org/

Current Ratings Definition.

SECTOR OUTPERFORM: An “outperform” rating anticipates the company will outperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR PERFORM: A “market perform” rating anticipates the company will perform in line with the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR UNDERPERFORM: An “underperform” rating anticipates the company will underperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

Limitation Of Research And Information.

This Report has been prepared for distribution to only qualified institutional or professional clients of 22V Research Group. The contents of this Report represent the views, opinions, and analyses of its authors. The information contained herein does not constitute financial, legal, tax or any other advice. All third-party data presented herein were obtained from publicly available sources which are believed to be reliable; however, the Company makes no warranty, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of such information. In no event shall the Company be responsible or liable for the correctness of, or update to, any such material or for any damage or lost opportunities resulting from use of this data. Nothing contained in this Report or any distribution by the Company should be construed as any offer to sell, or any solicitation of an offer to buy, any security or investment. Any research or other material received should not be construed as individualized investment advice. Investment decisions should be made as part of an overall portfolio strategy and you should consult with a professional financial advisor, legal and tax advisor prior to making any investment decision. 22V Research Group shall not be liable for any direct or indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage (including loss of profits, revenue or goodwill) arising from any investment decisions based on information or research obtained from 22V Research Group.

Reproduction And Distribution Strictly Prohibited.

No user of this Report may reproduce, modify, copy, distribute, sell, resell, transmit, transfer, license, assign or publish the Report itself or any information contained therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, clients with access to working models are permitted to alter or modify the information contained therein, provided that it is solely for such client’s own use. This Report is not intended to be available or distributed for any purpose that would be deemed unlawful or otherwise prohibited by any local, state, national or international laws or regulations or would otherwise subject the Company to registration or regulation of any kind within such jurisdiction.

Copyrights, Trademarks, Intellectual Property.

22V Research Group, and any logos or marks included in this Report are proprietary materials. The use of such terms and logos and marks without the express written consent of 22V Research Group is strictly prohibited. The copyright in the pages or in the screens of the Report, and in the information and material therein, is proprietary material owned by 22V Research Group unless otherwise indicated. The unauthorized use of any material on this Report may violate numerous statutes, regulations and laws, including, but not limited to, copyright, trademark, trade secret or patent laws.