Back European Strategy/Geopolitics

Update of Iran – What Day 1 Brought

Published on March 1, 2026

Download the PDF Report

By

Jacob Funk Kirkegaard

The U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran on Day 1 brought several surprising events, though overall from a military point of view the campaign in which attacking aircrafts have already achieved full air superiority over Iran already looks quite similar to the 12-day war last June.

The successful decapitation strike that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei at the start of the war is an obvious tactical and operational success that opens up Iran’s future in unpredictable ways. Perhaps the biggest surprise of the war’s first day is the increasingly indiscriminate nature of Iran’s retaliation through missiles and drones at Gulf region civilian infrastructure, while there as expected has not yet been any confirmed attacks directly on the regional oil sector.

The death of Ali Khamenei leaves an important power vacuum at the heart of the Iranian regime, which though is not likely to directly affect near-term military activities, but which will push Iran towards an uncertain future direction. Khamenei’s unique position as both the (de facto) head of state and religious leader of Iran and many Shi’ite Muslims around the world makes him arguably irreplaceable, as no one individual has both the domestic state and religious authority. Reports that his son was also killed in the early strike underlines the lack of any obvious successor holding both authorities. This means that the Iranian regime will likely face significant organizational change, no matter the ultimate outcome of the war.

It is far from obvious that the elimination of Khamenei will materially weaken the cohesion of the Iranian regime, and indeed his “warrior death” might well strengthen internal regime cohesion and produce a more hardline successor – we simply don’t know yet. His killing will likely also mean that who- and whatever replaces him at the top of Iran’s power pyramid may be further incentivized to produce a nuclear weapon – something Khamenei (allegedly never ordered and) never succeeded to do. Afterall, any regime who has seen its leader killed by a direct foreign attack will probably want to take out further insurances for the future. As such, it is quite plausible that post-Khamenei Iran will be even more radical than before, resulting in even more frequent military confrontations with the United States, Israel and possibly its regional neighbors.

The killing of Khamanei lastly does however offer Donald Trump a plausible “off-ramp” more or less any time of his choice, given that he can choose to declare victory in this confrontation based politically mostly on killing Iran’s Supreme Leader. This means that the probability of an early end to the confrontation in the coming few days have likely increased with Khamanei’s death, though remains well under 50 percent. An in Israeli eyes premature end to hostilities will also open up the possibility that Israel continues attacking Iran, even after U.S. strikes end. Iran’s dramatic retaliation against regional Gulf Arab states also makes an early end to hostilities much more difficult, as President Trump will likely not want to leave his regional allies at least partly at the mercy of a still functioning Iranian missile and drone threat.

Iran’s increasingly numerous attacks on civilian infrastructure across the Gulf region is a major escalatory surprise in the war from Tehran. It may origin in a – almost certainly mistaken – belief that such attacks can push Gulf Arab governments to put political pressure on Donald Trump to end the war. Given the experienced indiscriminate nature of these attacks, it is almost certainly going to have to opposite political effect now, as Gulf Arab states will have to contemplate taking a far more active supportive role in trying to bring the Iranian attacks to an end, having already been exposed to far more intense retaliation than they will likely have imagined possible.

That estimates now suggests that the Gulf region and UAE in particular (targeted by 137 missiles and 209 drones) has been targeted by more Iranian missiles and drones than Israel will be a major shock to local governments, even if the mostly ballistic missiles fired at Israel are deadlier and the Gulf Arab air defenses have actually performed quite well against the Iranian onslaught. Experiences from Ukraine shows that some missiles and drones always make it through, and there is also a further risk to civilian infrastructure from falling drone and missile debris and especially drones “led astray” by electronic warfare measures. The effect on the regional Gulf Arab logistics and tourism sectors however is somewhat similar, irrespective of what precisely caused a detonation in the middle of a civilian area, and Iran’s far more numerous retaliation will hence put additional economic strain on the region both in the short, and likely long-run. Visitors’ and investors’ threat perceptions concerning the riskiness of the Gulf region may have shifted lastingly upwards, at least as long as the current Iranian regime remains in power.

Despite the large number of attacks against regional civilian infrastructure, there have as expected not been any confirmed attacks aimed directly against the regional oil trade. Predictably, insurance costs and common commercial precaution have significantly reduced the flow of shipping to and from the Persian Gulf, but this must be distinguished from Iran trying to “close the Strait of Hormuz” or directly target the oil trade. Apart from declaring the Strait closed to “enemy U.S. ships” – the U.S. Navy will not care – Iran has not attempted to do so, and as its navy and overall capabilities are being constantly degraded by ongoing U.S. and Israeli attacks, looks unlikely to do so going forward.

Given the broad attacks on regional civilian infrastructure, a significant general decline in container ships, bulk carriers and other ships sailing through the Strait of Hormuz looks likely, a development that could relatively quickly cause some bottlenecks in the region in the availability of some fresh food for instance (much of which came from Iran incidentally) or other specific products. Yet at the same time, it seems most likely that larger oil tankers are likely to very soon find it commercially viable to sail through the Strait again. One early category of tankers to watch closely here will be tankers transporting crude oil to China, which may not operate on “normal commercial conditions” and which Iran for political and economic reasons will want to ensure has safe passage. As such, any decline in the flow of sea-borne crude oil through the Strait of Hormuz is likely to be very brief, and the associated upward pressure on oil prices contained. Today’s OPEC+ announcement concerning a 206,000 barrels/day production increase should directionally have the same effect.

The reported attack on a small Palau-flagged tanker (subject to U.S. sanctions for transporting Iranian refined oil products) in Omani waters does not constitute an attack on regional oil trade, but does together with other Iranian attacks on Omani infrastructure highlight the generally far higher than expected risk acceptance by the Iranian regime in its choice of retaliation. It is possible that the high number of strikes reflect a breakdown of central command and control, leaving it to local commanders to order attacks before risking the loss of their missile and drone assets to U.S. or Israeli strikes. If this is the case, a significant decline in such attacks should be expected in the coming days, as the political failure of the regional retaliatory strategy should become clearer to Tehran.

Finally, the question about the role of the Iranian people remains crucial. It is possible again here that the killing of Khamenei will mobilize regime supporters among the Iranian population in the coming days. But should be expected as air superiority has been fully established that U.S. and Israeli air strikes will increasingly also target the regime institutions in the IRGC and Basij militia that is directly responsible for domestic repression, potentially setting the stage for renewed local protests across Iran. The possibility for renewed popular protests in Iran therefore remains a key unknown to watch in this conflict.

Jacob

DISCLOSURES AND DISCLAIMERS

Analyst Certification

The analyst, 22V Research Group, primarily responsible for the preparation of this research report attests to the following: (1) that the views and opinions rendered in this research report reflect his or her personal views about the subject companies or issuers; and (2) that no part of the research analyst’s compensation was, is, or will be directly related to the specific recommendations or views in this research report.

Analyst Certifications and Independence of Research.

Each of the 22V Research analysts whose names appear on the front page of this report hereby certify that all the views expressed in this Report accurately reflect our personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers and that no part of our compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views of in this Report.

22V Research (the “Company”) is an independent research provider. The Company is not a member of the FINRA or the SIPC and is not a registered broker dealer or investment adviser. 22V Research has no other regulated or unregulated business activities which conflict with its provision of independent research.

22V Research, LLC is a professional services and independent publication organization. 22V Research, LLC is not a securities broker-dealer, not a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), not a registered investment advisor (RIA) and not a member of SIPC.

Securities transactions, when offered, are offered by 22V Securities, LLC through LPS Capital, LLC. Certain employees of 22V Securities, LLC are dually registered as securities representatives of LPS Capital, LLC or Analyst Hub Securities, LLC. 22V Securities, LPS Capital and Analyst Hub Securities are members FINRA, SIPC.

https://brokercheck.finra.org/

Current Ratings Definition.

SECTOR OUTPERFORM: An “outperform” rating anticipates the company will outperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR PERFORM: A “market perform” rating anticipates the company will perform in line with the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR UNDERPERFORM: An “underperform” rating anticipates the company will underperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

Limitation Of Research And Information.

This Report has been prepared for distribution to only qualified institutional or professional clients of 22V Research Group. The contents of this Report represent the views, opinions, and analyses of its authors. The information contained herein does not constitute financial, legal, tax or any other advice. All third-party data presented herein were obtained from publicly available sources which are believed to be reliable; however, the Company makes no warranty, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of such information. In no event shall the Company be responsible or liable for the correctness of, or update to, any such material or for any damage or lost opportunities resulting from use of this data. Nothing contained in this Report or any distribution by the Company should be construed as any offer to sell, or any solicitation of an offer to buy, any security or investment. Any research or other material received should not be construed as individualized investment advice. Investment decisions should be made as part of an overall portfolio strategy and you should consult with a professional financial advisor, legal and tax advisor prior to making any investment decision. 22V Research Group shall not be liable for any direct or indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage (including loss of profits, revenue or goodwill) arising from any investment decisions based on information or research obtained from 22V Research Group.

Reproduction And Distribution Strictly Prohibited.

No user of this Report may reproduce, modify, copy, distribute, sell, resell, transmit, transfer, license, assign or publish the Report itself or any information contained therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, clients with access to working models are permitted to alter or modify the information contained therein, provided that it is solely for such client’s own use. This Report is not intended to be available or distributed for any purpose that would be deemed unlawful or otherwise prohibited by any local, state, national or international laws or regulations or would otherwise subject the Company to registration or regulation of any kind within such jurisdiction.

Copyrights, Trademarks, Intellectual Property.

22V Research Group, and any logos or marks included in this Report are proprietary materials. The use of such terms and logos and marks without the express written consent of 22V Research Group is strictly prohibited. The copyright in the pages or in the screens of the Report, and in the information and material therein, is proprietary material owned by 22V Research Group unless otherwise indicated. The unauthorized use of any material on this Report may violate numerous statutes, regulations and laws, including, but not limited to, copyright, trademark, trade secret or patent laws.