Back China Strategy

China: Reported stimulus plan would lower downside risks to growth but not provide a powerful demand boost

Published on December 24, 2024

∙ Download the PDF Report

By

Michael Hirson

Houze Song

Reuters reported today that China’s leadership is planning CNY 3 trillion in issuance of central government special bonds next year (link HERE). Below are our thoughts on how to put this report into macro context. The takeaway is that if the report is accurate, the increase in support for growth will be modest, especially relative to headwinds from potential US tariffs and weak demand within China.

Note that Beijing will only reveal the size and details of the fiscal package at the National People’s Congress in March, along with other targets such as for real GDP growth. The Reuters piece is the first of many articles to come in the next two months that speculate on these plans. You can find our overall expectations for 2025, based on the Dec. 12 Central Economic Work Conference, HERE.

Less fiscal stimulus than meets the eye

While Reuters and Bloomberg note this CNY 3 trillion would be a “record” issuance, it would only represent a modest increase in stimulus:

  • Subtract bank recapitalization. The Reuters report notes that of the CNY 3 trillion, CNY 1 trillion would go to recapitalizing the largest state banks. This is not fiscal stimulus in a direct sense though could help support credit growth (see further below).
  • Only a small increase over 2024 bond proceeds. The resulting CNY 2 trillion in funding for fiscal stimulus is consistent with earlier media reports and is what we anticipated in our basecase for fiscal stimulus in 2025, published in early November (link HERE). This amount represents a small increase (0.5 trillion, or 0.5% of GDP) above this year. While China’s central government only issued CNY 1 trillion in special bonds this year, it also had access to around 0.5 trillion in proceeds of special bonds issued in late 2023 and rolled over this year, for a total of CNY 1.5 trillion.
  • Actual spending will lag bond issuance, especially for construction activities. MOF recently reported that only slightly more than 50% of last year’s CNY 1 trillion special bond had been spent by October 2024. Such delays will continue into 2025, another reason that actual spending on the ground will be less than the headline numbers suggest. All in all, risks are tilted to the downside in terms of actual fiscal performance next year relative to market expectations.

Not a powerful boost to consumption

The type of fiscal spending also matters: support for consumption will do more to boost growth, and especially to reduce deflationary pressure, than investment spending. In this respect, the Reuters report is consistent with our expectations of only a moderate shift towards consumption spending:

  • Reuters indicates that CNY 1.3 trillion would go to funding an expanded version of China’s durable goods trade-in program as well as strategically important infrastructure projects. The trade-in program introduced this year provided subsidies for consumers to buy new autos and appliances and for firms to upgrade industrial equipment.
  • Given the other spending areas outlined, it sounds as though the funding for the consumer trade-in program would at most be around double the amount this year (CNY 300 billion). That may not be enough to sustain the recent pace: auto appliance sales have only picked up in the four months starting in August. To match that intensify over the course of the full year in 2025, it may thus take triple the amount of 2024 funding.
  • Even with the recent results of the trade-in program, overall retail sales have still been very weak due to broader macro headwinds, especially weak job and income growth. In short, this scale and type of stimulus is unlikely to produce a major consumption rebound, which would require a major fiscal package to boost job creation and/or spending that directly supports household income.
  • According to Reuters, the remaining CNY 0.7-1 trillion in the bond package would fund investments in advanced manufacturing and related tech (“new quality productive forces”). Such spending will help advance Xi’s industrial policy priorities but have a low multiplier in terms of boosting growth.

Bottom line for growth

Separate from the Reuters piece, media reports suggest that Beijing is providing local governments with early access to their 2025 bond quotas (which are still undisclosed). Unless the amount of quota significantly exceeds last year, this move is routine. Local government spending will likely pick up starting in mid-February, after the Lunar New Year holiday, providing some support for economic activity in March and into Q2.

For 2025, the bottom line is that the fiscal plan above, combined with our expectation of an increase in official budget deficit to 4% in 2025 (from 3% this year), would serve to stabilize growth at around 4.5% (from around 4.8% this year) in the face of US tariffs. It would not be a sufficiently strong impulse to domestic demand to promote a strong recovery or to break out of deflationary pressures. If Beijing truly wants to hit a 5% GDP growth target next year – as many domestic analysts expect – it will probably require more fiscal firepower than implied by Reuters.

The other key aspect of the stimulus program next year is credit stimulus. Recapitalization of the state banks through bond issuance is a necessary but not sufficient condition to boost credit growth in 2025. It will also require either major cuts to China’s lending rates (which may complicate exchange rate stability), or relaxation by the leadership of the constraints on borrowing by local government financing vehicles (LGFVs). Based on current policy signals, neither seems like a high probability. We noted in our CEWC report that Beijing’s strategy for local government debt is shifting from controlling growth in spending to stimulating growth and countering deflation, but that this is a gradual transition that will play out over the medium term.

DISCLOSURES AND DISCLAIMERS

Analyst Certification

The analyst, 22V Research Group, primarily responsible for the preparation of this research report attests to the following: (1) that the views and opinions rendered in this research report reflect his or her personal views about the subject companies or issuers; and (2) that no part of the research analyst’s compensation was, is, or will be directly related to the specific recommendations or views in this research report.

Analyst Certifications and Independence of Research.

Each of the 22V Research analysts whose names appear on the front page of this report hereby certify that all the views expressed in this Report accurately reflect our personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers and that no part of our compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views of in this Report.

22V Research (the “Company”) is an independent research provider. The Company is not a member of the FINRA or the SIPC and is not a registered broker dealer or investment adviser. 22V Research has no other regulated or unregulated business activities which conflict with its provision of independent research.

22V Research, LLC is a professional services and independent publication organization. 22V Research, LLC is not a securities broker-dealer, not a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), not a registered investment advisor (RIA) and not a member of SIPC.

Securities transactions, when offered, are offered by 22V Securities, LLC through LPS Capital, LLC. Certain employees of 22V Securities, LLC are dually registered as securities representatives of LPS Capital, LLC or Analyst Hub Securities, LLC. 22V Securities, LPS Capital and Analyst Hub Securities are members FINRA, SIPC.

https://brokercheck.finra.org/

Current Ratings Definition.

SECTOR OUTPERFORM: An “outperform” rating anticipates the company will outperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR PERFORM: A “market perform” rating anticipates the company will perform in line with the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR UNDERPERFORM: An “underperform” rating anticipates the company will underperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

Limitation Of Research And Information.

This Report has been prepared for distribution to only qualified institutional or professional clients of 22V Research Group. The contents of this Report represent the views, opinions, and analyses of its authors. The information contained herein does not constitute financial, legal, tax or any other advice. All third-party data presented herein were obtained from publicly available sources which are believed to be reliable; however, the Company makes no warranty, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of such information. In no event shall the Company be responsible or liable for the correctness of, or update to, any such material or for any damage or lost opportunities resulting from use of this data. Nothing contained in this Report or any distribution by the Company should be construed as any offer to sell, or any solicitation of an offer to buy, any security or investment. Any research or other material received should not be construed as individualized investment advice. Investment decisions should be made as part of an overall portfolio strategy and you should consult with a professional financial advisor, legal and tax advisor prior to making any investment decision. 22V Research Group shall not be liable for any direct or indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage (including loss of profits, revenue or goodwill) arising from any investment decisions based on information or research obtained from 22V Research Group.

Reproduction And Distribution Strictly Prohibited.

No user of this Report may reproduce, modify, copy, distribute, sell, resell, transmit, transfer, license, assign or publish the Report itself or any information contained therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, clients with access to working models are permitted to alter or modify the information contained therein, provided that it is solely for such client’s own use. This Report is not intended to be available or distributed for any purpose that would be deemed unlawful or otherwise prohibited by any local, state, national or international laws or regulations or would otherwise subject the Company to registration or regulation of any kind within such jurisdiction.

Copyrights, Trademarks, Intellectual Property.

22V Research Group, and any logos or marks included in this Report are proprietary materials. The use of such terms and logos and marks without the express written consent of 22V Research Group is strictly prohibited. The copyright in the pages or in the screens of the Report, and in the information and material therein, is proprietary material owned by 22V Research Group unless otherwise indicated. The unauthorized use of any material on this Report may violate numerous statutes, regulations and laws, including, but not limited to, copyright, trademark, trade secret or patent laws.