Back Portfolio Strategy

Lower Nearby Recession Odds Mean More Mean Reversion Amid Still High Uncertainty

Published on June 5, 2023

∙ Download the PDF Report

By

Dennis DeBusschere

Brian Herlihy

Kevin Brocks

Sophia Wang

SUMMARY: The payroll report did not change the June FOMC hike vs. pause odds but did suggest wage growth could be settling out at too high a level. That is why a “skip is probably a better word than pause to describe what is teed up for June” according to Gerard. Investors have fully priced a ‘skip’ with a hike on July 26th and the back end of the Fed funds futures curve shifting meaningfully higher. No cuts are priced this year (from here).

The increase in UST yields associated with the higher expected Fed funds rate has not tightened financial conditions. Lower immediate recession odds are what is driving UST yields higher, and that is why FCI has not tightened. If the Fed SIGNALS they will be more aggressive in pushing back against economic strength, financial conditions will tighten at a time when “underlying demand” is running at about 1%. 1% is not far from zero, which is why recession odds would increase if the Fed assumed a more aggressive stance. Then Cyclical gains would fade. For now, that is not an issue, and stable to easier financial conditions favor deeper Cyclicals.

Transition Phase, Financial Conditions & Deep Cyclical Mean Reversion: According to our Quant modeling, the economy remains in Transition; a period defined by economic signals that give no clear indication of recession or normal growth. Transitions are also periods prone to mean reversion, higher correlations, and outperformance of Quality and Defensives factors. Quality and Defensives have done great, but financial conditions remain the most important influence over sectors during this phase of the cycle. FCI is likely to be biased easier for the coming month as recession risk declines and banking lending standards don’t tighten nearly as much as feared. That should favor the deeper Cyclicals that lagged last month. If we are wrong on FCI over the coming month (June 16th Fed meeting will be a test), we are likely wrong on Deeper Cyclicals mean reversion.

A graph of blue and orange lines

Description automatically generated with low confidence

Other Reversions: Higher softer landing odds should help the “average stock” relative to the mega caps (John Roque highlighted that the Russell 2000 has held support for the last 13 months. Plus it is oversold) and we should expect some mean reversion in stocks that have been hit particularly hard from “destocking”. Given the inventory unwinds in 1Q23 (HERE), if economic growth stays firmer for longer, production should pick up, and the “destocking losers”, which have had terrible performance, would have a significant bounce. At least over the next month. That would favor XRT (retail) and IYT (transports). Tough to remain short those popular shorts in our view.

Full report below…

MARKET VIEWS: The data has been much better than feared and as Gerard pointed out yesterday, the payroll report did not change the June odds, but it does appear that wage growth could be settling out at too high of a level. That is why a “skip is probably a better word than pause to describe what is teed up for June.” Investors have fully priced in the skip as a hike on July 26th is the base case and the back end of the Fed funds futures curve has shifted meaningfully higher. On May 4th a roughly 4.2% fed funds rate was expected on December 23. Only a month later, the December Fed funds rate is expected to be 5%. No cuts are expected from here.

For now, the increase in UST yields associated with the increase in the expected Fed funds rate has not tightend financial conditions (FCI). Stocks are higher, credit spreads tighter and inflation expectations are stable. Lower odds of an immediate recession are what is driving UST yields higher, which is why FCI has not tightened. If the Fed SIGNALS they will be more aggressive in pushing back against economic strength, financial conditions will tighten at a time when “underlying demand” (The New York Fed Weekly Economic index represents underlying demand in the chart below) is running at about 1%. 1% is not far from zero, which is why recession odds would increase if the Fed got more aggressive. For now, that is not an issue, and stable to easier financial conditions would favor deeper Cyclicals.

Regime Update: With macro readings still mixed, the 22V Macro Regime Classification model that the quant team has been leaning on continues to signal an economy in Transition. That has been the case for more than a year. As the rarest macro regime historically, accounting for 7.4% of all historical periods, the current year-plus Transition makes up fully half of ALL Transitions back to 1985. Recall, Transition periods are defined by economic signals that give no clear indication of recession or normalcy, and are prone to mean reversion and higher correlations.

For the current Transition period, financial conditions remain the most important influence over sector returns. Early Cyclicals tend to do well during FCI tightening periods while Deep Cyclicals perform relatively well during periods of easing financial conditions. Banking sector issues have not been nearly as damaging to the economy as feared, employment growth is firm, and financial conditions are easing. That should favor the deeper Cyclicals that lagged last month.

Deeper Cyclicals (Energy, Materials, Industrials) have had a very nice run relative to Defensives over the past month (mostly the past few weeks). We expect that to continue through the month of June. Unless we get something from the Fed on June 16th that signals they want financial conditions to tighten aggressively.

Other Reversions: We are re-highlighting something we focused on in our Friday webinar and Weekly report yesterday. Higher softer landing odds should help the “average stock” relative to the mega caps and we should expect some mean reversion in stocks that have been hit particularly hard from “destocking”. Reduced bank risk and a firmer than expected economy should favor some mean reversion in small caps relative to Nasdaq performance.

Source: Bloomberg, 22V Research

John Roque pointed out yesterday that the Russell 2000 has held support for the last 13 months. Plus it is oversold.

A picture containing text, screenshot, font, line

Description automatically generated

Retail and transports have been hit particularly hard by “destocking”. The labor market is fine now, which should keep consumer spending at healthy levels (roughly 2% of spending is the current trend), and the housing data has already bottomed. Given the inventory unwinds in 1Q23 (HERE), if econ growth stays firmer for longer, production should pick up, and the “destocking losers”, which have had terrible performance, would have a significant bounce. At least over the next month. That would favor XRT (retail)… 

  

And IYT (transport ETF).

DISCLOSURES AND DISCLAIMERS

Analyst Certification

The analyst, 22V Research Group, primarily responsible for the preparation of this research report attests to the following: (1) that the views and opinions rendered in this research report reflect his or her personal views about the subject companies or issuers; and (2) that no part of the research analyst’s compensation was, is, or will be directly related to the specific recommendations or views in this research report.

Analyst Certifications and Independence of Research.

Each of the 22V Research analysts whose names appear on the front page of this report hereby certify that all the views expressed in this Report accurately reflect our personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers and that no part of our compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views of in this Report.

22V Research (the “Company”) is an independent research provider. The Company is not a member of the FINRA or the SIPC and is not a registered broker dealer or investment adviser. 22V Research has no other regulated or unregulated business activities which conflict with its provision of independent research.

22V Research, LLC is a professional services and independent publication organization. 22V Research, LLC is not a securities broker-dealer, not a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), not a registered investment advisor (RIA) and not a member of SIPC.

Securities transactions, when offered, are offered by 22V Securities, LLC through LPS Capital, LLC. Certain employees of 22V Securities, LLC are dually registered as securities representatives of LPS Capital, LLC or Analyst Hub Securities, LLC. 22V Securities, LPS Capital and Analyst Hub Securities are members FINRA, SIPC.

https://brokercheck.finra.org/

Current Ratings Definition.

SECTOR OUTPERFORM: An “outperform” rating anticipates the company will outperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR PERFORM: A “market perform” rating anticipates the company will perform in line with the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

SECTOR UNDERPERFORM: An “underperform” rating anticipates the company will underperform the S&P Regional Banking Index (peer group).

Limitation Of Research And Information.

This Report has been prepared for distribution to only qualified institutional or professional clients of 22V Research Group. The contents of this Report represent the views, opinions, and analyses of its authors. The information contained herein does not constitute financial, legal, tax or any other advice. All third-party data presented herein were obtained from publicly available sources which are believed to be reliable; however, the Company makes no warranty, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of such information. In no event shall the Company be responsible or liable for the correctness of, or update to, any such material or for any damage or lost opportunities resulting from use of this data. Nothing contained in this Report or any distribution by the Company should be construed as any offer to sell, or any solicitation of an offer to buy, any security or investment. Any research or other material received should not be construed as individualized investment advice. Investment decisions should be made as part of an overall portfolio strategy and you should consult with a professional financial advisor, legal and tax advisor prior to making any investment decision. 22V Research Group shall not be liable for any direct or indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage (including loss of profits, revenue or goodwill) arising from any investment decisions based on information or research obtained from 22V Research Group.

Reproduction And Distribution Strictly Prohibited.

No user of this Report may reproduce, modify, copy, distribute, sell, resell, transmit, transfer, license, assign or publish the Report itself or any information contained therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, clients with access to working models are permitted to alter or modify the information contained therein, provided that it is solely for such client’s own use. This Report is not intended to be available or distributed for any purpose that would be deemed unlawful or otherwise prohibited by any local, state, national or international laws or regulations or would otherwise subject the Company to registration or regulation of any kind within such jurisdiction.

Copyrights, Trademarks, Intellectual Property.

22V Research Group, and any logos or marks included in this Report are proprietary materials. The use of such terms and logos and marks without the express written consent of 22V Research Group is strictly prohibited. The copyright in the pages or in the screens of the Report, and in the information and material therein, is proprietary material owned by 22V Research Group unless otherwise indicated. The unauthorized use of any material on this Report may violate numerous statutes, regulations and laws, including, but not limited to, copyright, trademark, trade secret or patent laws.